DocPad
DocPad rethought web development and was the first big static site generator for Node.js gaining over 2000 stars, hundreds of daily users, 200 plugins, and 100 contributors.
Last updated
Was this helpful?
DocPad rethought web development and was the first big static site generator for Node.js gaining over 2000 stars, hundreds of daily users, 200 plugins, and 100 contributors.
Last updated
Was this helpful?
DocPad lead the static-site-generator wave throughout 2011 until 2014, and I am proud of my investment's accomplishments during that time. However despite lingering users and a dark age of prolonged unpaid maintenance, these days it should be considered archived for the history books. It could not keep up with the competitive landscape in a way that provided return for investment, especially when considering the sunken ship of opportunity cost of the time that was invested into it.
DocPad's final releases were devoted to wrap up the project with a nice bow, and to admit its mistakes. Something which in hindsight, was also a mistake — an abrupt end would have been a better investment of time — unfortunately my conscience required closure to move on.
These are the summaries of DocPad's final hurrah:
v6.79 was the last release to support legacy plugins
v6.80 incorporated many years of ecosystem upgrades, increased performance, solved many long-standing issues, removed all non-vital server communication, and dropped support for legacy plugins
v6.81 removed the dynamic abilities from DocPad which was an innovative feature of DocPad at the time but it grew to become better served by newer tooling such as Next and Nuxt
v6.82 made many refinements and fixed many long-standing issues
v6.83 removed the last cloud code, and updated the Bevry packages for massive peformance improvements
These days you are better served by either:
The un-staticsitegenerators concept, which is using a collection of independent unix-style commands composed into a completely customisable and interchangeable build system with only 20 lines of code.
Whatever tools that Headless Content Management Systems integrate with.
Personally, I find lit-html's ecosystem promising.
For those wanting to write their own static site generators, here are my learnings.
For those wanting to avoid the same time investment mistake, please read Zero to One — if that book existed earlier, it would have saved me a decade of my life.
With that said, the documentation continues for your lingering curiosity. DocPad should still work, but if it doesn't, you're on your own. Please submit fixes to the documentation if needed.
Regards, Benjamin Lupton, Creator of DocPad
DocPad takes files on your computer, such as easy to read markdown documents, and then transforms them into static output that can be deployed anywhere.
Despite all the amazing wonder of current web application architectures, they're mostly:
Inherently slow
Usually built on blocking, live-then-die platforms
Performance is an afterthought, re-render every single time (by default, caching can be enabled to improve this)
Bloated
Huge, include-everything codebase, with little or no code re-use (especially between frameworks)
Overkill for everything, as no single project will use every feature of the CMS
Complex
Gigantic learning curves, usually measured in months (instead of days or hours)
You require CMS/framework developers instead of web developers
Difficult
Setting up a new website is time-consuming and complex
Uh oh! "database not installed" or "version invalid"
Migrations and deployments are a royal pain in the ass
Limited
WYSIWYG editors are sucky and stupid - why re-invent the wheel? We're already trained with and love our desktop counterparts (Sublime Text, Vim, Byword, etc.)
Abstractions on the go? Forget it - you're boxed in, unless you've got a machete
Want to use your own pre-processors, markups, and templating engines? Tough: they're handled by the core.
On the other hand, let's compare that with DocPad, which is:
Website inherently fast
Built on a non-blocking, stay-alive platform
Performance from the ground up, re-render only when changes occur (by default, can be configured differently)
Lightweight
Tiny core, with anything that's re-usable abstracted out into modules that other systems can use
All non-essential core functionality lives in opt-in plugins
Simple
Tiny learning curve; get started in minutes, become a pro in days
Web developers already have everything they need to get started
Easy
Setting up a new website can be done in minutes
In-memory database provides querying without the need for a manual installation
Migrations and deployments are handled via Git, the tool we are used to
Robust
Use your desktop counterparts to edit content naturally (Sublime Text, Vim, Byword, etc.)
Abstraction friendly; code the way you want, how you want
Use whatever language, pre-processor, markup, templating engine you want - it's all covered via our opt-in plugins (and if it isn't, it's very easy to add)
Besides this, thanks to the opt-in modular philosophy of Node, we benefit from all the innovations of the community as a whole, including:
Socket.io for realtime communication between the server and client-side
Browserify for being able to share server-side code directly with the client-side
Native pre-processor rendering such as CoffeeScript, CoffeeKup, Stylus, LessCSS, etc.
So as the Node community grows and innovates, so do we. Awesome.
For those who like tables, here's the above in table form:
Feature
Usual CMS
Usual Static Site Generator
DocPad
Talent requirements
CMS developer
Backend+frontend developer
Frontend developer
Developers proficient in
Months
Days
Days
Layouts
Yes
Yes
Yes
Static website output
No
Yes
Yes
Watching
N/A
Yes
Yes
Differential regenerations
N/A
No
Yes
Manual database installation required
Yes
No
No
Import pages from file system
No
Yes
Yes